From 49114d2b7a36137cbb79e987faf4aa0cdbfb80c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Cook Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 23:57:20 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typos in easysync-full-description.tex --- doc/easysync/easysync-full-description.tex | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/easysync/easysync-full-description.tex b/doc/easysync/easysync-full-description.tex index a831da647..5ed9f29e3 100644 --- a/doc/easysync/easysync-full-description.tex +++ b/doc/easysync/easysync-full-description.tex @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ For any two changesets $A$, $B$ such that \begin{itemize} \item[] $A=(n_1\rightarrow n_2)[\cdots]$ -\item[] $A=(n_2\rightarrow n_3)[\cdots]$ +\item[] $B=(n_2\rightarrow n_3)[\cdots]$ \end{itemize} it is clear that there is a third changeset $C=(n_1\rightarrow n_3)[\cdots]$ such that applying $C$ to a document $X$ yeilds the same resulting document as does applying $A$ and then $B$. In this case, we write $AB=C$. @@ -97,14 +97,14 @@ It is impossible to compute $(XA)B$ because $B$ can only be applied to a documen This is where \emph{merging} comes in. Merging takes two changesets that apply to the same initial document (and that cannot be composed), and computes a single new changeset that presevers the intent of both changes. The merge of $A$ and $B$ is written as $m(A,B)$. For the Etherpad system to work, we require that $m(A,B)=m(B,A)$. -Aside from what we have said so far about merging, there aremany different implementations that will lead to a workable system. We have created one implementation for text that has the following constraints. +Aside from what we have said so far about merging, there are many different implementations that will lead to a workable system. We have created one implementation for text that has the following constraints. \section{Follows} \label{follows} When users $A$ and $B$ have the same document $X$ on their screen, and they proceed to make respective changesets $A$ and $B$, it is no use to compute $m(A,B)$, because $m(A,B)$ applies to document $X$, but the users are already looking at document $XA$ and $XB$. What we really want is to compute $B'$ and $A'$ such that $$XAB' = XBA' = Xm(A,B)$$ -``Following'' computes these $B'$ and $A'$ changesets. The definition of the ``follow'' function $f$ is such that $Af(A,B)=Bf(B,A)=m(A,B)=m(B,A)$. When we computer $f(A,B)$. +``Following'' computes these $B'$ and $A'$ changesets. The definition of the ``follow'' function $f$ is such that $Af(A,B)=Bf(B,A)=m(A,B)=m(B,A)$. When we compute $f(A,B)$ \begin{itemize} \item Insertions in $A$ become retained characters in $f(A,B)$ \item Insertions in $B$ become insertions in $f(A,B)$